Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/774361680461570048
added 3 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Wrzlprmft
  • 65k
  • 18
  • 199
  • 307

I am attempting to transform the content of my MA thesis into a piece of academic writing which can be published. This is the first time I have done this, and I am concerned that some of my main arguments will become lost in the process. 

How can I successfully condense my writing but still present my points, when I have 6-86–8,000 words to work with, rather than the original 20-3020–30,000, on the basis that many of my arguments are theoretical and need careful explanation?

I am attempting to transform the content of my MA thesis into a piece of academic writing which can be published. This is the first time I have done this, and I am concerned that some of my main arguments will become lost in the process. How can I successfully condense my writing but still present my points, when I have 6-8,000 words to work with, rather than the original 20-30,000, on the basis that many of my arguments are theoretical and need careful explanation?

I am attempting to transform the content of my MA thesis into a piece of academic writing which can be published. This is the first time I have done this, and I am concerned that some of my main arguments will become lost in the process. 

How can I successfully condense my writing but still present my points, when I have 6–8,000 words to work with, rather than the original 20–30,000, on the basis that many of my arguments are theoretical and need careful explanation?

Source Link

Transforming an MA thesis for publication

I am attempting to transform the content of my MA thesis into a piece of academic writing which can be published. This is the first time I have done this, and I am concerned that some of my main arguments will become lost in the process. How can I successfully condense my writing but still present my points, when I have 6-8,000 words to work with, rather than the original 20-30,000, on the basis that many of my arguments are theoretical and need careful explanation?