Timeline for How can we justify basic research funding?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2016 at 15:14 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Aug 14, 2016 at 21:14 | |||||
| Aug 13, 2016 at 15:31 | comment | added | Clement C. | Wouldn't that be more suited to a comment, though? As of now, this argues how one should reinterpret and answer the question, yet does not actually do it. | |
| Aug 13, 2016 at 14:41 | comment | added | elan.em | The way I see things, I set the objective of the question to consolidate viewpoints in favour of "maintaining the status quo for (or even increasing) the funding of [basic research]" in response to decreased basic research funding internationally. In doing so, I failed to address the question of "Should we even maintain the status quo or consider increasing the funding of basic research?"; this was one-sided. What do you suggest to be more balanced - a new section in the question, a new question completely, community edits (with permission) to your answer, or something else? Thanks. | |
| Aug 13, 2016 at 14:21 | history | answered | Michael Kay | CC BY-SA 3.0 |