Timeline for How to write abstract for conference when you have no results yet?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 at 8:02 | comment | added | Tobias Kienzler | +1 for "[it] is a lie even if you are sure", though I wouldn't say don't submit at all - I've heard enough talks at conferences which deviated more or less from the abstract, usually "excused" by e.g. "I'd like to focus more on some results obtained after the abstract's submission", which is fine as long as long as it obviously is an extension of what the abstract promised anyway. It may be annoying that the abstract (which may be published at the proceedings) will not reflect the entirety of the work, but a) there may be a paper submission after the conference and b) you'll publish anyway | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 19:03 | history | edited | F'x | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Jan 24, 2013 at 18:21 | history | answered | seteropere | CC BY-SA 3.0 |