Timeline for How to write abstract for conference when you have no results yet?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 21, 2016 at 0:37 | comment | added | jvriesem | @Tomas: Did it work out as you said? | |
Feb 3, 2013 at 18:55 | vote | accept | Tomas | ||
Feb 3, 2013 at 18:55 | comment | added | Tomas | This is the most useful answer. My final solution was exactly that: not writing about results, just talking about the hypotheses, why they are so much interesting and how this study helps to finally shed light on them! I registered it as a talk, not poster... let's see! | |
Jan 25, 2013 at 18:47 | comment | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | Inre: Bait and switch. I've seen more than a few people simply get up and say "Things have moved on since I submitted the abstract for this talk, and what I'm really going to talk about is <new abstract>". The audience understands the problem with abstract deadlines perfectly well. | |
Jan 25, 2013 at 8:54 | comment | added | Kris | If you mean 'write abstract, don't write results', that should have been put that way I think. | |
Jan 24, 2013 at 22:13 | comment | added | blackace | @silvado nowadays if its a major conference you will be recorded and it will end up on the web. This has happened to me in the past 4 conferences I have presented at so internet is starting to join all conferences... | |
Jan 24, 2013 at 19:54 | comment | added | silvado | @JeffE, I agree with being careful, but the internet won't usually join the conference to see the poster or oral presentation. | |
Jan 24, 2013 at 14:44 | comment | added | JeffE | people won't remember — Careful. The internet remembers. | |
Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02 | comment | added | Tomas | Thank you. As for point 2. In the link I posted they justify bait-n-switch a lot, arguing that people won't remember. I wouldn't be afraid of that. The problem is that I have only small portion (like 1/8) of final results. I'm afraid that reporting this small subset of results would make it even more apparent that results are missing or cause people to think "..and that's all?" | |
Jan 24, 2013 at 10:47 | history | answered | F'x | CC BY-SA 3.0 |