Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 21, 2016 at 0:37 comment added jvriesem @Tomas: Did it work out as you said?
Feb 3, 2013 at 18:55 vote accept Tomas
Feb 3, 2013 at 18:55 comment added Tomas This is the most useful answer. My final solution was exactly that: not writing about results, just talking about the hypotheses, why they are so much interesting and how this study helps to finally shed light on them! I registered it as a talk, not poster... let's see!
Jan 25, 2013 at 18:47 comment added dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten Inre: Bait and switch. I've seen more than a few people simply get up and say "Things have moved on since I submitted the abstract for this talk, and what I'm really going to talk about is <new abstract>". The audience understands the problem with abstract deadlines perfectly well.
Jan 25, 2013 at 8:54 comment added Kris If you mean 'write abstract, don't write results', that should have been put that way I think.
Jan 24, 2013 at 22:13 comment added blackace @silvado nowadays if its a major conference you will be recorded and it will end up on the web. This has happened to me in the past 4 conferences I have presented at so internet is starting to join all conferences...
Jan 24, 2013 at 19:54 comment added silvado @JeffE, I agree with being careful, but the internet won't usually join the conference to see the poster or oral presentation.
Jan 24, 2013 at 14:44 comment added JeffE people won't remember — Careful. The internet remembers.
Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02 comment added Tomas Thank you. As for point 2. In the link I posted they justify bait-n-switch a lot, arguing that people won't remember. I wouldn't be afraid of that. The problem is that I have only small portion (like 1/8) of final results. I'm afraid that reporting this small subset of results would make it even more apparent that results are missing or cause people to think "..and that's all?"
Jan 24, 2013 at 10:47 history answered F'x CC BY-SA 3.0