Timeline for How to write abstract for conference when you have no results yet?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2018 at 21:31 | history | protected | Alexandros | ||
| Apr 9, 2018 at 19:01 | answer | added | guest | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 9, 2018 at 10:36 | answer | added | Vivian Morgan Mitchell | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 8, 2014 at 3:00 | answer | added | user21569 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 14, 2014 at 9:31 | comment | added | David Richerby | @Yrogirg No, that's a completely different situation. You're being asked to give a talk about research you plan to do in the future. Tomas is supposed to give a talk about research that he will have done by the time he gives the talk but he has to provide a summary of the talk now, when the work has barely started. | |
| Aug 14, 2014 at 9:28 | comment | added | David Richerby | @Suresh The situation in CS is different because, although submission deadlines are typically several months before the conference, you have to submit a paper describing your work so the work must be essentially completed at submission time. Here, the question is about merely submitting an abstract for a talk to be given several months in the future. | |
| Jul 21, 2013 at 10:19 | comment | added | Yrogirg | heh, I'm in a similar situation --- as a part of interview for a PhD position I am meant to give a talk on a group seminar on what I want to research. Obviously I have no results, only arguments. | |
| Apr 3, 2013 at 4:13 | answer | added | psm | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 3, 2013 at 18:55 | vote | accept | Tomas | ||
| Jan 25, 2013 at 11:36 | answer | added | StrongBad | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 23:48 | answer | added | aeismail | timeline score: 14 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 19:57 | comment | added | eykanal | I find it fascinating that the "don't do it" and the "I can't afford not to" comments both have many upvotes. This definitely speaks to the pressure to publish at these venues. @DanielE.Shub | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 18:21 | answer | added | seteropere | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 17:15 | comment | added | Suresh | I should point out: if this situation is not uncommon, you should be thinking of January as the deadline and not September. this is very common in CS for example. | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 15:40 | answer | added | Tobias Kienzler | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 10:47 | comment | added | Nobody | My suggestion is, if you're sure you'll have interesting results, write the reasons why you're sure. | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 10:47 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/294395989123543041 | ||
| Jan 24, 2013 at 10:47 | answer | added | F'x | timeline score: 53 | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 10:32 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 24, 2013 at 10:47 | |||||
| Jan 24, 2013 at 10:30 | comment | added | Tomas | No abstract means missed opportunity; I cannot afford that. I have to present results I'm sure I will have by the time of the conference. | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 10:29 | history | edited | Tomas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 31 characters in body
|
| Jan 24, 2013 at 10:25 | comment | added | StrongBad | Don't do it. No results means no abstract. | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 10:16 | history | asked | Tomas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |