Timeline for When I compare my results to others in the literature should this go in results or discussion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2016 at 20:46 | comment | added | Nij | While I think that is true, what we intend to do is not always what happens. | |
| Jul 18, 2016 at 14:08 | comment | added | If you do not know- just GIS | I have no intention of misleading anyone. | |
| Jul 18, 2016 at 4:02 | comment | added | Nij | I assume that if you are reporting results, they are your own, or at least those of your coauthors. Mixing the work of your collaboration and that of others with no relation becomes highly complicated at best, confusing or hard to read most often, and quite possibly misleading. Better to make clear what is the fruit of your own work, and then make clear what is a comparison of that to others'. | |
| Jul 18, 2016 at 3:30 | comment | added | If you do not know- just GIS | Do any exceptions exist to this rule? | |
| Jul 18, 2016 at 2:56 | history | answered | Nij | CC BY-SA 3.0 |