Timeline for Is it a good strategy to reproduce figures from related articles in NSF proposal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 18, 2018 at 0:17 | comment | added | Michael Ekstrand | Leaving this here for the benefit of future readers: applying for CAREER in the first year can sometimes work, but is often a waste of your first attempt opportunity. Spend your first 1-2 years gathering your own preliminary results, developing an educational program, and preparing to apply. | |
Feb 20, 2017 at 0:39 | answer | added | aloraine | timeline score: 1 | |
Jun 15, 2016 at 15:37 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/743105254846238720 | ||
Jun 15, 2016 at 8:27 | comment | added | Gautier C | I don't think it is a good things, especially since you're supposed to do it yourself. Anyway If you do it, don't forget to mention it is not yours, and why you did it. | |
Jun 15, 2016 at 7:36 | comment | added | ff524 | I edited out the part about copyright because it's a duplicate of this question. P.S. for future reference: please ask one question per post. | |
Jun 15, 2016 at 7:34 | history | edited | ff524 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
Jun 15, 2016 at 7:32 | comment | added | ff524 | I haven't been on a CAREER review panel (I'm only a PhD student myself) so take my advice as the uninformed opinion that it is, but based on all the advice I've been given on writing CAREER proposals, using more than a few figures (at most) from other people seems like a bad idea in most cases. You want to show that you have the skills and resources to carry out your research plan. | |
Jun 15, 2016 at 7:27 | history | edited | ff524 |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 15, 2016 at 7:24 | review | First posts | |||
Jun 15, 2016 at 7:28 | |||||
Jun 15, 2016 at 7:24 | history | asked | Bhats | CC BY-SA 3.0 |