Timeline for Choosing between a one page abstract in conference proceedings and full version on arXiv, or publishing full paper in conference proceedings
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2017 at 6:01 | vote | accept | Erel Segal-Halevi | ||
| May 12, 2016 at 1:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/730563800928256000 | ||
| May 11, 2016 at 15:41 | comment | added | Jouni Sirén | Is the conference a pure computer science one or in an interdisciplinary field? Interdisciplinary conferences often offer options like that, as they have to deal with different publication cultures. For example, CS-oriented bioinformatics journals tend to accept extended versions of conference papers, while biologically oriented journals don't. | |
| May 11, 2016 at 15:15 | answer | added | ff524 | timeline score: 7 | |
| May 11, 2016 at 15:04 | comment | added | DMML | This is a good question! @ff524 I agree: conference proceedings vs. arxiv is definitely the peer-reviewed factor! What about the 1 page abstract with a chance to publish in a journal later (+ arxiv) instead of just having the paper published in the conference proceedings? CS seems to place heavy emphasis on publishing in conferences anyway? What advantage does a journal publication at a later date offer? Sorry If I'm hijacking the question... | |
| May 11, 2016 at 15:02 | comment | added | ff524 | Yes, but that is why journals might distinguish between a paper published in conference proceedings or one published on arXiv. It doesn't consider the latter to be already "published." | |
| May 11, 2016 at 15:01 | comment | added | Erel Segal-Halevi | @ff524 but the paper is peer-reviewed anyway... after it is peer-reviewed and accepted, I have a choice whether to publish it as a one-page abstract or a full paper. | |
| May 11, 2016 at 14:38 | history | edited | ff524 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title; edited tags
|
| May 11, 2016 at 14:36 | comment | added | ff524 | A major difference between conference proceedings and arXiv is that conference proceedings are peer reviewed (in CS). Some people consider something to be "published" when it appears in a peer-reviewed venue, and not published otherwise. | |
| May 11, 2016 at 14:28 | history | asked | Erel Segal-Halevi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |