Timeline for Is it better to NOT have an RA, and instead be doing a TA for the first couple of years of PhD?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2016 at 3:51 | comment | added | JeffE | I strongly disagree with this answer. Doing research is important. Being an RA is not. | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 19:11 | comment | added | user42273 | I really like this answer. You are right, getting publications and establishing one's name as a researcher does take time. I am back to being stressed about this, but I guess that's better than being under the delusion that all is well the way it is. Thanks a lot for your response! | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 19:10 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Mar 9, 2016 at 18:52 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 9, 2016 at 19:55 | |||||
| Mar 9, 2016 at 18:45 | history | answered | user50532 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |