Timeline for Is it plagiarism to reference a fictitious source?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2016 at 22:19 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | Therefore, my director decided that, in the event that the student had fabricated sources, we could not give a zero. – Your policies do indeed need some revamping. I suggest to include some general rule that any intentional attempt to deceive the examiners is considered cheating. Actually, I am perplexed that this should be necessary, as deceit is part of the dictionary definition of cheating. (Sidenote: The German word for cheating in an official context when talking about exams even is Täuschungsversuch, which literally translates to attempt to deceive.) | |
| Mar 4, 2016 at 22:10 | history | edited | Wrzlprmft♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
List formatting, capitalisation and minor stuff.
|
| Mar 4, 2016 at 21:35 | history | answered | tylerharms | CC BY-SA 3.0 |