2 Teh typors
source | link

No, it's defenatelydefinitely not a plagiatrismplagiarism! It is a misguide or clear lies - because the source does not exist at all. If the source does existsexist and it is used but not mentioned as a sorcesource - only then it's a plagiatrismplagiarism.

No, it's defenately not a plagiatrism! It is a misguide or clear lies - because the source does not exist at all. If the source does exists and it is used but not mentioned as a sorce - only then it's a plagiatrism.

No, it's definitely not a plagiarism! It is a misguide or clear lies - because the source does not exist at all. If the source does exist and it is used but not mentioned as a source - only then it's a plagiarism.

1
source | link

No, it's defenately not a plagiatrism! It is a misguide or clear lies - because the source does not exist at all. If the source does exists and it is used but not mentioned as a sorce - only then it's a plagiatrism.