Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link

Write a blog post

  • blog posts in general are very appreciated by software devs. (I used to spend ages reading them when I was working as a dev to keep up on state of the art)
    • This of-course assumes your "thing" is software related.
  • Academics in general, do read and write blog posts. They are more annoying to cite, but still reasonable.
  • There are a few micro-fields of applied CS that publish exclusively through blog posts (The only one I know of is "Arbitrary Precision Document Representation")
  • You're not a professional academic, therefore you have no "publish or perish" based KPI (Key Performance Indicator)
  • further as a nonacademic writing publishing a paper gains you very little increase in employ-ability (even if it gets cited thousands of times). Some employers might care, for most its just going to be a neat thing you did once (not that different to how they might feel if you said you have climbed Mt Everest)
  • You (as you admit) don't have the skills to write a paper, nor the connections to get someone to help. You do have the skill to write a blog post you demonstrated that in the asking the question.
  • Not related works is expected in a blog post, it doesn't matter how trivial etc. The worst judgement someone is going to pass on you is ignoring it.

You can supplement this by writing a paper, and putting in on a pre-print repository like arXiv. As @Ilmari suggests in comments

  • These tend to have low bar for entry, and are not peer-reviewed.
  • It is almost certainly going to be around forever. (even if CorbellCornell Univerisy vanishes, there are certainly going to be independent backups that can recreate the data)
  • it is indexed by academic search engines like Google Scholar, so it will be found easily.
  • Lots of industry academics (at lest in my field), tend to publish on arXiv, because they don't have the need to publish to keep their jobs.
  • it is easy to cite, and is becoming quiet common to cite a work published only on arXiv.

You can then link to it in the blog post, saying "A more formal writeup is available on ..."

Write a blog post

  • blog posts in general are very appreciated by software devs. (I used to spend ages reading them when I was working as a dev to keep up on state of the art)
    • This of-course assumes your "thing" is software related.
  • Academics in general, do read and write blog posts. They are more annoying to cite, but still reasonable.
  • There are a few micro-fields of applied CS that publish exclusively through blog posts (The only one I know of is "Arbitrary Precision Document Representation")
  • You're not a professional academic, therefore you have no "publish or perish" based KPI (Key Performance Indicator)
  • further as a nonacademic writing publishing a paper gains you very little increase in employ-ability (even if it gets cited thousands of times). Some employers might care, for most its just going to be a neat thing you did once (not that different to how they might feel if you said you have climbed Mt Everest)
  • You (as you admit) don't have the skills to write a paper, nor the connections to get someone to help. You do have the skill to write a blog post you demonstrated that in the asking the question.
  • Not related works is expected in a blog post, it doesn't matter how trivial etc. The worst judgement someone is going to pass on you is ignoring it.

You can supplement this by writing a paper, and putting in on a pre-print repository like arXiv. As @Ilmari suggests in comments

  • These tend to have low bar for entry, and are not peer-reviewed.
  • It is almost certainly going to be around forever. (even if Corbell Univerisy vanishes, there are certainly going to be independent backups that can recreate the data)
  • it is indexed by academic search engines like Google Scholar, so it will be found easily.
  • Lots of industry academics (at lest in my field), tend to publish on arXiv, because they don't have the need to publish to keep their jobs.
  • it is easy to cite, and is becoming quiet common to cite a work published only on arXiv.

You can then link to it in the blog post, saying "A more formal writeup is available on ..."

Write a blog post

  • blog posts in general are very appreciated by software devs. (I used to spend ages reading them when I was working as a dev to keep up on state of the art)
    • This of-course assumes your "thing" is software related.
  • Academics in general, do read and write blog posts. They are more annoying to cite, but still reasonable.
  • There are a few micro-fields of applied CS that publish exclusively through blog posts (The only one I know of is "Arbitrary Precision Document Representation")
  • You're not a professional academic, therefore you have no "publish or perish" based KPI (Key Performance Indicator)
  • further as a nonacademic writing publishing a paper gains you very little increase in employ-ability (even if it gets cited thousands of times). Some employers might care, for most its just going to be a neat thing you did once (not that different to how they might feel if you said you have climbed Mt Everest)
  • You (as you admit) don't have the skills to write a paper, nor the connections to get someone to help. You do have the skill to write a blog post you demonstrated that in the asking the question.
  • Not related works is expected in a blog post, it doesn't matter how trivial etc. The worst judgement someone is going to pass on you is ignoring it.

You can supplement this by writing a paper, and putting in on a pre-print repository like arXiv. As @Ilmari suggests in comments

  • These tend to have low bar for entry, and are not peer-reviewed.
  • It is almost certainly going to be around forever. (even if Cornell Univerisy vanishes, there are certainly going to be independent backups that can recreate the data)
  • it is indexed by academic search engines like Google Scholar, so it will be found easily.
  • Lots of industry academics (at lest in my field), tend to publish on arXiv, because they don't have the need to publish to keep their jobs.
  • it is easy to cite, and is becoming quiet common to cite a work published only on arXiv.

You can then link to it in the blog post, saying "A more formal writeup is available on ..."

added 797 characters in body
Source Link

Write a blog post

  • blog posts in general are very appreciated by software devs. (I used to spend ages reading them when I was working as a dev to keep up on state of the art)
    • This of-course assumes your "thing" is software related.
  • Academics in general, do read and write blog posts. They are more annoying to cite, but still reasonable.
  • There are a few micro-fields of applied CS that publish exclusively through blog posts (The only one I know of is "Arbitrary Precision Document Representation")
  • yYou'reYou're not a professional academic, therefore you have no "publish or perish" based KPI (Key Performance Indicator)
  • further as a nonacademic writing publishing a paper gains you very little increase in employ-ability (even if it gets cited thousands of times). Some employers might care, for most its just going to be a neat thing you did once (not that different to how they might feel if you said you have climbed Mt Everest)
  • You (as you admit) don't have the skills to write a paper, nor the connections to get someone to help. You do have the skill to write a blog post you demonstrated that in the asking the question.
  • Not related works is expected in a blog post, it doesn't matter how trivial etc. The worst judgement someone is going to pass on you is ignoring it.

You can supplement this by writing a paper, and putting in on a pre-print repository like arXiv. As @Ilmari suggests in comments

  • These tend to have low bar for entry, and are not peer-reviewed.
  • It is almost certainly going to be around forever. (even if Corbell Univerisy vanishes, there are certainly going to be independent backups that can recreate the data)
  • it is indexed by academic search engines like Google Scholar, so it will be found easily.
  • Lots of industry academics (at lest in my field), tend to publish on arXiv, because they don't have the need to publish to keep their jobs.
  • it is easy to cite, and is becoming quiet common to cite a work published only on arXiv.

You can then link to it in the blog post, saying "A more formal writeup is available on ..."

Write a blog post

  • blog posts in general are very appreciated by software devs. (I used to spend ages reading them when I was working as a dev to keep up on state of the art)
    • This of-course assumes your "thing" is software related.
  • Academics in general, do read and write blog posts. They are more annoying to cite, but still reasonable.
  • There are a few micro-fields of applied CS that publish exclusively through blog posts (The only one I know of is "Arbitrary Precision Document Representation")
  • yYou're not a professional academic, therefore you have no "publish or perish" based KPI (Key Performance Indicator)
  • further as a nonacademic writing publishing a paper gains you very little increase in employ-ability (even if it gets cited thousands of times). Some employers might care, for most its just going to be a neat thing you did once (not that different to how they might feel if you said you have climbed Mt Everest)
  • You (as you admit) don't have the skills to write a paper, nor the connections to get someone to help. You do have the skill to write a blog post you demonstrated that in the asking the question.
  • Not related works is expected in a blog post, it doesn't matter how trivial etc. The worst judgement someone is going to pass on you is ignoring it.

Write a blog post

  • blog posts in general are very appreciated by software devs. (I used to spend ages reading them when I was working as a dev to keep up on state of the art)
    • This of-course assumes your "thing" is software related.
  • Academics in general, do read and write blog posts. They are more annoying to cite, but still reasonable.
  • There are a few micro-fields of applied CS that publish exclusively through blog posts (The only one I know of is "Arbitrary Precision Document Representation")
  • You're not a professional academic, therefore you have no "publish or perish" based KPI (Key Performance Indicator)
  • further as a nonacademic writing publishing a paper gains you very little increase in employ-ability (even if it gets cited thousands of times). Some employers might care, for most its just going to be a neat thing you did once (not that different to how they might feel if you said you have climbed Mt Everest)
  • You (as you admit) don't have the skills to write a paper, nor the connections to get someone to help. You do have the skill to write a blog post you demonstrated that in the asking the question.
  • Not related works is expected in a blog post, it doesn't matter how trivial etc. The worst judgement someone is going to pass on you is ignoring it.

You can supplement this by writing a paper, and putting in on a pre-print repository like arXiv. As @Ilmari suggests in comments

  • These tend to have low bar for entry, and are not peer-reviewed.
  • It is almost certainly going to be around forever. (even if Corbell Univerisy vanishes, there are certainly going to be independent backups that can recreate the data)
  • it is indexed by academic search engines like Google Scholar, so it will be found easily.
  • Lots of industry academics (at lest in my field), tend to publish on arXiv, because they don't have the need to publish to keep their jobs.
  • it is easy to cite, and is becoming quiet common to cite a work published only on arXiv.

You can then link to it in the blog post, saying "A more formal writeup is available on ..."

Source Link

Write a blog post

  • blog posts in general are very appreciated by software devs. (I used to spend ages reading them when I was working as a dev to keep up on state of the art)
    • This of-course assumes your "thing" is software related.
  • Academics in general, do read and write blog posts. They are more annoying to cite, but still reasonable.
  • There are a few micro-fields of applied CS that publish exclusively through blog posts (The only one I know of is "Arbitrary Precision Document Representation")
  • yYou're not a professional academic, therefore you have no "publish or perish" based KPI (Key Performance Indicator)
  • further as a nonacademic writing publishing a paper gains you very little increase in employ-ability (even if it gets cited thousands of times). Some employers might care, for most its just going to be a neat thing you did once (not that different to how they might feel if you said you have climbed Mt Everest)
  • You (as you admit) don't have the skills to write a paper, nor the connections to get someone to help. You do have the skill to write a blog post you demonstrated that in the asking the question.
  • Not related works is expected in a blog post, it doesn't matter how trivial etc. The worst judgement someone is going to pass on you is ignoring it.