Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 5, 2016 at 19:09 comment added Phil Miller Thanks for editing :-). Fell free to directly incorporate suggestions as you see fit. I'm fine with sharing credit - after all, edit history is visible, and my comments are still here. I'd rather readers see the good stuff up front, rather than have to dig through the comments to piece it together. Upvotes on the comments wouldn't hurt, of course.
Jan 5, 2016 at 19:08 comment added Phil Miller Asking her to 'gently' point out gender bias is burdening her with making a complaint she felt necessary emotionally palatable to you. Turn that around. Make it clear to her that if she brings something up, you trust that she has a good reason. If it centers on something you do or have done, or someone you're inclined to stick up for, be prepared to process any tendency toward a defensive response on your own, or with someone else you can trust for advice. If you feel a need to ask for clarification on those events' practical or emotional impact, you should be trying to do that gently.
Jan 5, 2016 at 19:06 comment added donjuedo @Novelocrat Good point. I replaced the loaded term, but need not take credit for your additional wording and idea.
Jan 5, 2016 at 19:03 history edited donjuedo CC BY-SA 3.0
wording improvement
Jan 5, 2016 at 19:00 comment added Phil Miller 'Meritocracy' has become a very loaded term, usually with implications that claims of discrimination aren't credible. I would phrase that part along the lines of having admitted her because of an excellent track record to date, and an expectation that she'll continue to do good work.
Jan 5, 2016 at 18:58 comment added Phil Miller This is generally good, but your wording could use a fair bit of work. 2 comments to follow.
Jan 1, 2016 at 23:10 review First posts
Jan 1, 2016 at 23:34
Jan 1, 2016 at 23:04 history answered donjuedo CC BY-SA 3.0