Timeline for Do you let Google Scholar index popular science articles, conference abstracts, etc.?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2015 at 19:51 | comment | added | Joanna Bryson | I gave this the bonus because it came the closest to actually answering my question (the last paragraph.) A lot of the other answers didn't really address the question but talked about how to use GS, which I already do. | |
| Dec 26, 2015 at 19:46 | history | bounty ended | Joanna Bryson | ||
| Dec 23, 2015 at 15:19 | comment | added | Joanna Bryson | Thanks. Your usage is very much like my own. I certainly merge old versions etc. One difference in academia is that you have PhD students, so I feel badly to take off minor works for me that are major works for them. But I certainly have two separate CVs, one for business & one for academia. As you see from other responses, academics can be very concerned about not losing work, so I guess the real question here is whether google scholar is that place that's a complete index, or whether it's become a CV and therefore needs more substantial curating / pruning. | |
| Dec 22, 2015 at 20:33 | history | answered | JenB | CC BY-SA 3.0 |