Timeline for Can I trust a paper that hides implementation details?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2015 at 22:02 | comment | added | Dan Romik | Clarification to my previous comment: your "facetious example" does actually represent unethical behavior, since in that case I assume (based on your reference to Volkswagen) that you are referring to a researcher who fraudulently claims to have developed AI code that passes the Turing test when in fact he hasn't. I agree that is clearly unethical, and said the same thing in my own answer. However, if you did in fact invent true AI and didn't provide full human-readable code or documentation (which seems closer to the OP's scenario), then again that is not unethical, merely unhelpful. | |
| Dec 7, 2015 at 17:32 | comment | added | Dan Romik | Paul, I think you are confusing between not ethical and not useful. Ironically, that makes your answer not useful (although it is not unethical), illustrating exactly the same distinction. | |
| Dec 7, 2015 at 13:45 | comment | added | Nobody | Do you believe me? I'll try to believe you if you delete your another answer which is absolutely non-sense. | |
| Dec 7, 2015 at 13:22 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 7, 2015 at 13:27 | |||||
| Dec 7, 2015 at 13:19 | history | answered | Paul Uszak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |