Timeline for Submitting a manuscript that is not ready yet just to fulfil a contract
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 25, 2015 at 23:33 | comment | added | tomasz | +1 just for the first bullet. Way to stick it to the man! :) | |
Nov 25, 2015 at 15:52 | comment | added | Kenji | Thanks for the comforting comment. I try to look at the bright side and learn a lesson from it. | |
Nov 25, 2015 at 15:51 | comment | added | jakebeal | @Kenji Don't beat yourself up over the contract, either: it's easy to make mistakes like that early in your career. I've certainly made some myself. | |
Nov 25, 2015 at 15:50 | vote | accept | Kenji | ||
Nov 25, 2015 at 15:50 | comment | added | Kenji | I think I will first try to talk about these solutions with my co-author. Your advice seems sound. | |
Nov 25, 2015 at 15:48 | comment | added | jakebeal | @Kenji Then either your co-author should be willing to work with you regarding something like the solutions that I propose, or else they keep pressuring you and you should re-evaluate the degree to which you trust them. | |
Nov 25, 2015 at 15:30 | comment | added | Kenji | It all boils down to me accepting such a contract, but it is my first research contract of such type and I was foolish to sign it. I can't negotiate with the administrators handling it due to they speaking another language, being in another country, at a university I have not been to. I know that these things alone should have raised red flags, but my co-author who has double affiliation with my institution is someone whom I trust and who has been helpful through all the process. | |
Nov 25, 2015 at 15:29 | history | edited | jakebeal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
Nov 25, 2015 at 15:22 | history | answered | jakebeal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |