Timeline for What does this mean, "We recommend that you consider submission to an alternative venue"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 5, 2015 at 11:49 | comment | added | JNS | It appears your paper is off-topic for the journal. An example would be submitting a paper on moduli spaces in Yang-Mills theory to an experimental physics journal. The former is dealing with the fundamental or underlying theory, whilst the journal is looking for experimental physics. | |
Mar 5, 2015 at 7:50 | answer | added | Kakoli Majumder | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 23, 2012 at 10:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/282798840728387584 | ||
Dec 17, 2012 at 13:16 | vote | accept | Neo | ||
Dec 17, 2012 at 1:33 | comment | added | paul garrett | I think @eykanal made usefully explicit what was too implicit previously... Good. And this does resonate with the potential problem that (not only) a novice may inadvertently misrepresent themselves by failing to be explicit about what seemed obvious to them, but was not obvious to others, etc. Not an easy error to overcome, but awareness of its possibility is very useful. | |
Dec 17, 2012 at 0:28 | history | edited | eykanal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
formatting, expand
|
Dec 16, 2012 at 21:41 | history | edited | gerrit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
editorial edits
|
Dec 16, 2012 at 21:28 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | Would you please edit this question to give it a more descriptive title? | |
Dec 16, 2012 at 21:08 | comment | added | Suresh | "It's not you, it's me" :) | |
Dec 16, 2012 at 21:00 | answer | added | paul garrett | timeline score: 20 | |
Dec 16, 2012 at 21:00 | review | First posts | |||
Dec 17, 2012 at 4:21 | |||||
Dec 16, 2012 at 21:00 | answer | added | Paul Hiemstra | timeline score: 10 | |
Dec 16, 2012 at 20:43 | history | asked | Neo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |