Timeline for Is reusing old code for a new assignment considered self plagiarism? How to protect yourself if you consider it to be, and a group partner does not?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2016 at 23:15 | history | edited | einpoklum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2015 at 10:06 | history | edited | einpoklum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2015 at 10:05 | comment | added | einpoklum | @110100101110101: The fact that you think this is "terrible advice" is more the problem you're facing than anything else. The "terribleness" is, with all due respect, an incorrect impression of yours. As for reading minds - I don't, I'm extrapolating based on my experience and what you've described. Also note I said "about everyone"... | |
| Nov 5, 2015 at 10:03 | comment | added | einpoklum | @DanRomik: Rephrased that sentence to make it less, shall we say, dismissive. More constructive criticism would be appreciated though. | |
| Nov 5, 2015 at 10:00 | history | edited | einpoklum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2015 at 1:06 | comment | added | robert bristow-johnson | well i up-arrowed this. still left at -2. | |
| Nov 5, 2015 at 0:51 | comment | added | Byte Lab | You should "cheat". Even if it "doesn't feel right". Regardless of what "about everyone else concerned" thinks (I'm impressed that you're a mind reader and can read everyone else's thoughts), that is terrible advice. | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 23:48 | comment | added | Dan Romik | Everybody's answers are great, but long. And I see you decided to take the opposite approach on both counts. | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 23:18 | comment | added | einpoklum | To the nay-sayers: Well, somebody has to tell him that :-) | |
| Nov 4, 2015 at 22:14 | history | answered | einpoklum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |