Timeline for How to emphasize special issue publications in a CV?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://academia.stackexchange.com/ with https://academia.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 29, 2016 at 16:35 | answer | added | Ébe Isaac | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 29, 2016 at 16:28 | history | edited | Ébe Isaac |
edited tags
|
|
| Oct 2, 2015 at 14:07 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=41783 by developer User.Id=78 | |
| Sep 29, 2015 at 9:13 | answer | added | jakebeal | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 29, 2015 at 7:19 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/648759045726306304 | ||
| Sep 29, 2015 at 7:13 | comment | added | Aleksandr Blekh | @Wrzlprmft: For corresponding APA Style guidelines, see this post and this page. For relevant guidelines for both APA Style and MLA Style, see this Harvard Guide section. | |
| Sep 29, 2015 at 6:41 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | @AleksandrBlekh: Interestingly, I never saw a citation that mentioned that a paper was part of a special issue, except if the paper was the introduction to the special issue and mentioned it in its title. | |
| Sep 29, 2015 at 5:22 | comment | added | user41783 | Not a problem at all - no apology needed! I think I get into the mindset of following a style guide. | |
| Sep 29, 2015 at 5:18 | comment | added | Aleksandr Blekh | You're welcome. I'm sorry about the 'emphasise' change - while my version is a standard in US English, your original variant is indeed a valid one in some countries and SE, being an international community, should be open to using such alternative forms. Please let me know, if you want me to revert the change. | |
| Sep 29, 2015 at 5:04 | comment | added | user41783 | Thank you for the edit @AleksandrBlekh but it should be noted that where I am from, emphasise/emphasize is spelt with an 's' rather than a 'z' - is there a style guide for here? | |
| Sep 29, 2015 at 5:02 | history | edited | Aleksandr Blekh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed spelling. Improved grammar and wording.
|
| Sep 29, 2015 at 4:57 | comment | added | Aleksandr Blekh | I think you don't really have to to anything special in order to emphasize the "special issue" (no pun intended). Simply because, per most publication style guides (check the one you use, just in case), you have to (or, at least, can) provide that information as a part of standard reference entry. | |
| Sep 29, 2015 at 4:54 | answer | added | Anonymous Mathematician | timeline score: 12 | |
| Sep 29, 2015 at 4:42 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 29, 2015 at 6:41 | |||||
| Sep 29, 2015 at 4:40 | history | asked | user41783 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |