Timeline for Referring to papers by myself and others in my thesis
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 22, 2015 at 18:12 | answer | added | MrMeritology | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 22, 2015 at 10:13 | answer | added | Danny Ruijters | timeline score: 6 | |
Sep 22, 2015 at 7:53 | comment | added | Wooly Jumper | So you want to use "we" as in you and your supporting network (supervisors etc.) and you want to mention B and C by name, and you don't want to have citation as a word. I'd go for the second option. The only slight variation without "we", that I can think of is something like "Together (/In collaboration) with B and C, it was shown that this can be done [ABC15]." | |
Sep 21, 2015 at 21:08 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @A. Klomp: In fields where author ordering is alphabetical (like mathematics, including theoretical computer science), it is considered by many to be a very bad practice to list some but not all authors' names. This is a recipe for alienating someone for no good reason. | |
Sep 21, 2015 at 20:24 | answer | added | ResearchEnthusiast | timeline score: 2 | |
Sep 21, 2015 at 20:16 | history | edited | John K. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
context: theoretical computer science, we means "we"
|
Sep 21, 2015 at 15:23 | comment | added | John K. | @A.Klomp I am trying to avoid using a citation reference as a word. | |
Sep 21, 2015 at 13:14 | comment | added | Mangara | @A.Klomp But then what happens if there is another relevant paper by A, D, and E? Do you also refer to the authors as "we"? | |
Sep 21, 2015 at 9:44 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/645896458550517761 | ||
Sep 21, 2015 at 9:34 | comment | added | Davidmh | I have edited your comment in the question. It is better to add any clarification in the question itself than in comments that can get lost. | |
Sep 21, 2015 at 9:33 | history | edited | Davidmh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Inserting OP's clarifying comment in the question.
|
Sep 21, 2015 at 9:31 | review | First posts | |||
Sep 21, 2015 at 9:32 | |||||
Sep 21, 2015 at 9:28 | history | asked | John K. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |