Timeline for What happens to the reviews that people write for journal articles after they're sent back to the author?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2013 at 18:50 | answer | added | Peter Jansson | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 25, 2012 at 7:05 | comment | added | Federico Poloni | I can imagine one context in which it would be extremely useful to share them: rejected and resubmitted papers. As an editor, if I get a second-hand submission, I'd want to know why it was sacked the first time, who did the review, and what the authors did in reply. As far as I know, currently there is no practical nor moral obligation to even inform an editor that it is a resubmission. | |
| Sep 24, 2012 at 13:46 | answer | added | userJT | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 23, 2012 at 11:17 | history | edited | Noble P. Abraham |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 28, 2012 at 12:49 | comment | added | user102 | @ElCid No worries, flagging is always appreciated anyway :) | |
| Aug 28, 2012 at 12:31 | comment | added | ElCid | @CharlesMorisset: how i knew that i would screw up my first flag :) | |
| Aug 28, 2012 at 12:29 | comment | added | user102 | @ElCid Technically, InquilineKea asked the question before mine, so mine would be the duplicate :) However, I think the objective of the question are slightly different, as my question mostly focuses on the legal and ethical aspects of publishing a review, while this question is more general. | |
| Aug 28, 2012 at 12:21 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 28, 2012 at 12:31 | |||||
| Aug 28, 2012 at 12:18 | comment | added | ElCid | @InquilineKea possibly duplicate discussion here | |
| Mar 5, 2012 at 3:53 | answer | added | Fomite | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 4, 2012 at 15:38 | comment | added | InquilineKea | What about reviews post-publication? I'm actually learning how to write reviews myself, so I'm curious. Plus, it's always interesting how reviews shape the direction of a paper. | |
| Mar 4, 2012 at 12:13 | answer | added | Lars Kotthoff | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 4, 2012 at 11:35 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/176269742942855168 | ||
| Mar 4, 2012 at 5:36 | answer | added | aeismail | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 4, 2012 at 2:31 | comment | added | eykanal | I'm curious about your intent... why would there be a protocol for sharing reviews about a paper you publish? Why would you care about someone's comments on a paper I wrote that hasn't been published yet? | |
| Mar 4, 2012 at 1:11 | answer | added | Kieran | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 4, 2012 at 0:56 | history | asked | InquilineKea | CC BY-SA 3.0 |