Timeline for Is it bad form to use the word “novel” when describing your own work in a paper?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2015 at 1:28 | comment | added | user2813274 | @zibadawatimmy (and Wrzlprmft and dtldarek), thanks for the links - they were also useful | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 20:59 | answer | added | Wetlab Walter | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 19:07 | answer | added | Peteris | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 16:02 | vote | accept | user2813274 | ||
| Sep 4, 2015 at 14:28 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/639807227549876228 | ||
| Sep 4, 2015 at 12:41 | answer | added | David Richerby | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 12:04 | answer | added | vonbrand | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 11:23 | comment | added | dtldarek | In my opinion the word "novel" might actually be useful in a similar way as "obvious" is here and here, especially if the work contains multiple results. | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 8:34 | answer | added | O. R. Mapper | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 6:44 | history | edited | Wrzlprmft♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Sep 4, 2015 at 6:43 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | Related, though not duplicate: http://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48873/7734 | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 6:40 | answer | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | timeline score: 27 | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 5:53 | comment | added | zibadawa timmy | Although technically a different question, I'd say the top answer here answers your question. | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 5:52 | answer | added | Paul Hiemstra | timeline score: 10 | |
| Sep 4, 2015 at 5:21 | history | asked | user2813274 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |