Skip to main content
Academia

Return to Answer

added 2 characters in body
Source Link
David Ketcheson
David Ketcheson
  • 37.2k
  • 10
  • 113
  • 164

In applied math (at least in my subfield), most papers do have a conclusion, and it's almost always a useless repetition of things already stated in the introduction (sometimes word-for-word). Please don't follow that pattern!

I try to use a conclusion only if there are general observations or discussion that I wish to include and that would not make sense in the introduction. This is rarely the case.

In applied math (at least in my subfield), most papers do have conclusion, and it's almost always a useless repetition of things already stated in the introduction (sometimes word-for-word). Please don't follow that pattern!

I try to use a conclusion only if there are general observations or discussion that I wish to include and that would not make sense in the introduction. This is rarely the case.

In applied math (at least in my subfield), most papers do have a conclusion, and it's almost always a useless repetition of things already stated in the introduction (sometimes word-for-word). Please don't follow that pattern!

I try to use a conclusion only if there are general observations or discussion that I wish to include and that would not make sense in the introduction. This is rarely the case.

Source Link
David Ketcheson
David Ketcheson
  • 37.2k
  • 10
  • 113
  • 164

In applied math (at least in my subfield), most papers do have conclusion, and it's almost always a useless repetition of things already stated in the introduction (sometimes word-for-word). Please don't follow that pattern!

I try to use a conclusion only if there are general observations or discussion that I wish to include and that would not make sense in the introduction. This is rarely the case.