Timeline for How can we perpetuate reproducibility?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2015 at 2:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/637812764275306496 | ||
| Aug 27, 2015 at 0:40 | comment | added | Daniel Mietchen | @jvriesem I am waiting for further answers, and commented on yours. | |
| Aug 25, 2015 at 16:39 | comment | added | jvriesem | @DanielMietchen: Is there anything I can do to improve my answer, or are you waiting to get more answers? | |
| Aug 24, 2015 at 0:03 | answer | added | Anonymous Physicist | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 23, 2015 at 4:48 | comment | added | Daniel Mietchen | @Wrzlprmft I removed the plagiarism-related part from the question, as it was just tangential. | |
| Aug 23, 2015 at 4:46 | history | edited | Daniel Mietchen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
rephrased in response to comments
|
| Aug 22, 2015 at 7:33 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | @DanielMietchen: Yes, and on levels other than copyright, Guttenberg lost his doctor, had to resign as a minister and is stigmatised. So, this is a typical example where plagiarism is not primarily treated as a copyright issue. It is actually one of the few cases of plagiarism that was also taken to court as a copyright issue – which was only a sidenote in the whole affair of things. | |
| Aug 21, 2015 at 23:08 | comment | added | Daniel Mietchen | @Wrzlprmft I am talking about academic plagiarism, and an example would be this one from Die ZEIT: "Ex-Minister Guttenberg habe zwar gegen Urheberrechte verstoßen, doch der wirtschaftliche Schaden sei gering, stellt die Staatsanwaltschaft fest – und das Verfahren ein." The Telegraph wrote about "copyright infringement" too. | |
| Aug 21, 2015 at 22:41 | comment | added | Daniel Mietchen | @JeromyAnglim What I mean is that if someone builds on some work that meets some reproducibility criteria (e.g. as laid out in a given institutional or funder policy), then that derivative work (be it a corroboration or a harsh critique) should be held up to the same or stricter reproducibility criteria. | |
| Aug 21, 2015 at 7:03 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | the common practice of framing plagiarism primarily or even exclusively as a copyright issue – Are you talking about academic plagiarism or plagiarism in general here? In the former case, I am not aware of a single case supporting this statement. | |
| Aug 21, 2015 at 7:01 | comment | added | Jeromy Anglim | I agree with eykanal. I think there is an interesting question in here, but it needs to be more clearly articulated. What aspect of reproducibility are you asking about? How are you defining perpetuation? is it more than just having an effect of increasing reproducibility? | |
| Aug 21, 2015 at 3:56 | answer | added | jvriesem | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 21, 2015 at 3:10 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 21, 2015 at 7:04 | |||||
| Aug 21, 2015 at 2:31 | history | edited | ff524 |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 20, 2015 at 23:09 | comment | added | Daniel Mietchen | The original thread is now available through github.com/Daniel-Mietchen/SE-Static/blob/master/openscience/… , and I have found some help pages. | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 22:18 | comment | added | Daniel Mietchen | The first and only answer I got over there was very productive and to the point - hope it will be posted here too. In order to comply better with scope limitations, it would be helpful if you (or anyone) could point me to a place where scope - or criteria for holding or closing or protecting or deleting questions or answers or comments - are spelled out. Haven't gone through all of meta.academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scope yet. | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 22:13 | history | edited | Daniel Mietchen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fix link; will think about content edits to address scope; am reading up on scope right now
|
| Aug 20, 2015 at 21:58 | comment | added | eykanal | Again, this question seems to actually be a springboard for discussion on the topic of perpetuating reproducibility. I apologize for being a pain in the backside... I'm honestly impressed with the effort you guys are putting in to make this site merge work. Can this also be edited to make it more of an answerable question as opposed to an invitation for discussion? | |
| Aug 20, 2015 at 21:35 | history | asked | Daniel Mietchen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |