Timeline for What to do on finding a major flaw in a conference paper?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2015 at 17:45 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/607241803012706304 | ||
| Jun 6, 2015 at 7:39 | vote | accept | Arani | ||
| Jun 5, 2015 at 8:09 | answer | added | Danny Ruijters | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 13:00 | comment | added | Stephan Kolassa | Related: How to address a mistake in an old paper in a very prestigious scientific journal? and What should you do if you spotted a non-trivial error in a highly cited paper? and What should/can I do on finding an error in a published article? | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 12:54 | comment | added | dearN | @Arani I am not sure if this is uncommon in computer science but (major) flaws do occur in some mechanical engineering conferences. The reason for this is usually that the deadline for the conference paper submission is much earlier (~6 months in advance even) with respect to the actual conference presentation. Hence the paper is not up to date. What does happen is that the author has already taken note of this and has made sufficient adjustments to their PRESENTATION. They might have forgotten to do the same for the paper. Your best bet would be to contact the author and ask them about it. | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 12:43 | comment | added | Arani | @StephanKolassa Thanks -- I have now added this information. | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 12:42 | history | edited | Arani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added information to improve my question
|
| Jun 2, 2015 at 12:32 | comment | added | Arani | @StephanKolassa No, its not my paper. I have found a flaw while reading a paper. | |
| Jun 2, 2015 at 12:12 | history | asked | Arani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |