Timeline for What should I do if I cannot accept any of the hypotheses in a replicated experiment?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2015 at 18:34 | answer | added | Dave Clarke | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 18:18 | comment | added | Neacel | @cpast I do have an adviser but I want to discuss the problem first here because bringing it to my adviser. | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 18:13 | comment | added | Neacel | @Penguin_Knight do you suggest that if I know about the error then it should be fine? What I mean about the third paragraph is that I found "missed opportunities" of the authors of the original experiment. I added some things so I can measure the extension. | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 16:25 | comment | added | cpast | Do you have an adviser for this thesis? What do they suggest? | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 16:23 | answer | added | dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 15:23 | comment | added | Penguin_Knight | I'm not sure what kind of answer you're looking for, as you "know where the problem is coming from but it is too late to re-do," which means you do know there is a flaw that causes the lack of agreement. If that's true, why would you want to stage the whole situation as if it's a legitimate lack of reliability? In addition, perhaps because I am not from your field, I cannot understand any of the third paragraph. | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 14:44 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 19, 2015 at 15:25 | |||||
| Mar 19, 2015 at 14:43 | history | asked | Neacel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |