Timeline for Having a co-author as an external examiner for doctoral thesis defense
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 9, 2015 at 16:46 | comment | added | Dikran Marsupial | I'd be very surprised if your universities regulations did not explicitly forbid this; it would be a clear conflict of interest. | |
Mar 9, 2015 at 0:01 | comment | added | Austin Henley | @DavidRicherby I certainly did misunderstand then! Thanks for clarifying. | |
Mar 8, 2015 at 23:58 | comment | added | David Richerby | @AustinHenley I think you've misunderstood the situation. In the UK, you have two examiners. One of them must be from your own institution; the other must be from some other institution: it's not "can" but "must". | |
Mar 8, 2015 at 17:54 | vote | accept | user1953384 | ||
Mar 8, 2015 at 17:49 | answer | added | Pete L. Clark | timeline score: 8 | |
Mar 8, 2015 at 17:43 | comment | added | Austin Henley | If you do a google search for your university and "phd external examiner", you should find something. I just checked 3 universities in the UK and they all had their policies online (i.e., you can have an external examiner but their qualifications must be approved). | |
Mar 8, 2015 at 17:38 | history | edited | user1953384 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Revised ambiguous title.
|
Mar 8, 2015 at 17:36 | comment | added | user1953384 | My supervisor actually suggested that I contact him, but he wasn't sure either if it would be allowed. And he just said, "We'd have to check this." (not where or with whom though). I didn't know that this was something that varied from university to university? I expected there to be some sort of a national or global consensus on the matter. | |
Mar 8, 2015 at 17:33 | comment | added | Davidmh | What does your university regulations say? What does your supervisor say? | |
Mar 8, 2015 at 17:24 | review | First posts | |||
Mar 8, 2015 at 19:27 | |||||
Mar 8, 2015 at 17:22 | history | asked | user1953384 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |