Timeline for Should I share my horrible software?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2015 at 22:38 | comment | added | JeffE | You shared your opinion, of course. | |
| Jan 29, 2015 at 22:27 | comment | added | CaptainCodeman | @JeffE I didn't share anything, what are you talking about? I find your message cryptic. If you wish to be understood, please be a bit more clear. | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 23:06 | comment | added | CaptainCodeman | @Contango Yeah that's a fair point if releasing the software helps to reproduce the results. | |
| Jan 26, 2015 at 12:58 | comment | added | Contango | Sure, sharing may be optional outside the scientific community, but it sure is not optional inside the scientific community. | |
| Jan 26, 2015 at 12:56 | comment | added | Contango | Reproducable results are one of the cornerstones of the scientific method. And that requires sharing. You comment is akin to saying "... but really, Scientists have no obligation to adhere to the scientific method." | |
| Jan 25, 2015 at 14:15 | history | answered | CaptainCodeman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |