Timeline for Isn't ghostwriting reverse-plagiarism?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2012 at 20:09 | comment | added | mankoff | @F'x you are right. However, I do know of some famous highly-cited anonymous publications. I cannot find them in my reference library at the moment. Regardless, your edit clarifies your stance on this. | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 19:18 | comment | added | F'x | @mankoff That search returns mostly results on rsc.org that correspond to editorials of journals of the Royal Society of Chemistry… even though they don't have the metadata properly given in the HTML, you can look at the PDF and the articles are signed by their authors | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 19:02 | history | edited | aeismail | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 637 characters in body
|
| Oct 10, 2012 at 17:54 | comment | added | mankoff | There are many anonymous academic publications. See, for example, "author:anonymous" search on Google Scholar scholar.google.com/scholar?q=author%3Aanonymous | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | F'x | I wonder: it is ethical (though probably not very common) to pay for proofreading or translation services, or to pay for someone to make graphs, figures or other visualization work for you… what is fundamentally different about writing that it wouldn't be ethical to hire someone to write papers for you? (I mean, just the writing part, based on a draft of your results and discussions, or something like that) Where is the limit? | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 15:41 | history | answered | aeismail | CC BY-SA 3.0 |