Timeline for In what situations would it be appropriate to include one's photograph in a CV?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2022 at 15:19 | comment | added | Kvothe | Another purpose (perhaps still inappropriate) is to remind the person reviewing the CV that this is someone they have previously interacted with. Some people remember faces better than names. | |
| Jul 20, 2022 at 15:18 | comment | added | Kvothe | @aeismail, that is an interesting and strong statement (somewhat meaninglessly weakened by basically). Is it or is it not? Or is it genuinely legally ambiguous and to be tested by the courts? Is it state dependent or federal? | |
| May 7, 2016 at 13:21 | vote | accept | Felix Y. | ||
| May 7, 2016 at 13:20 | vote | accept | Felix Y. | ||
| May 7, 2016 at 13:20 | |||||
| Oct 16, 2014 at 10:56 | comment | added | Trylks | I'd be interested in knowing how many people link their LinkedIn profile (or similar networks)(with a photo) in their CV, how many employers/recruiters/whatever, check the profile and find appropriate that there is a link to that and a photo there. | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 10:55 | comment | added | aeismail | However, I want to disagree with the point about not including photographs where they're normally included. If you're coming from a tradition where it's not done, I think people will accept that. I also think it's not such a big deal to omit a photo as one gets higher up in academic circles. | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 10:54 | comment | added | aeismail | It's basically against US equal-employment laws to consider photographs. | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 8:45 | history | answered | Anonymous Mathematician | CC BY-SA 3.0 |