Timeline for Word limit for paper after addressing reviewer's comments
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 2, 2014 at 6:34 | comment | added | Senex | Comment from a referee's point of view: I reviewed an article submitted for a special issue of a journal. In order to meet a page limit, the author had left out some auxiliary results that he had previously published in a Russian-language journal that was not available online. I recommended the paper be accepted only if the editors granted an extra 2-3 pages to allow those results to be included. The editors accepted my suggestion and waived the page limit. | |
Oct 1, 2014 at 16:13 | vote | accept | Rob Hall | ||
Oct 1, 2014 at 16:12 | answer | added | Rob Hall | timeline score: 13 | |
Sep 24, 2014 at 3:25 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/514616651447549953 | ||
Sep 19, 2014 at 11:24 | comment | added | Rob Hall | @Wrzlprmft: You are making an excellent point. Journals definitely would not advertise having a lenient policy after revision and would probably have to change it if it became widely known. However, I could imagine that they simply are not too worried about it as long as people do not seem to abuse it. | |
Sep 18, 2014 at 20:22 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | Not really an experience and thus not an answer: But think about what would happen if journals generally allowed for this. All the horrible authors, who submit drafts instead of finished manuscripts anyway, would intentionally leave out important details or scale down their figures ridiculously just to meet the word limit. | |
Sep 18, 2014 at 18:08 | answer | added | Mad Jack | timeline score: 11 | |
Sep 18, 2014 at 17:32 | review | Close votes | |||
Sep 18, 2014 at 20:54 | |||||
Sep 18, 2014 at 17:27 | history | edited | Rob Hall | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 24 characters in body
|
Sep 18, 2014 at 17:22 | history | edited | Rob Hall | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 201 characters in body
|
Sep 18, 2014 at 17:19 | comment | added | Rob Hall | I am interested in the general issue, so please feel free to take this as a general question. I would imagine other academics might find themselves in a similar situation and some general advice might be useful, even if the specific journal policies may vary. | |
Sep 18, 2014 at 17:17 | review | First posts | |||
Sep 18, 2014 at 17:59 | |||||
Sep 18, 2014 at 17:15 | comment | added | Davidmh | In my opinion, this question appears to be off-topic because it refers to the specific policies of an editor, that we can't possibly know. | |
Sep 18, 2014 at 17:12 | history | asked | Rob Hall | CC BY-SA 3.0 |