Timeline for Under what circumstances can one republish a conference paper/presentation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2013 at 20:11 | history | edited | Peter Jansson |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 2, 2012 at 10:38 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/230975819168751616 | ||
| Jul 31, 2012 at 10:10 | vote | accept | StrongBad | ||
| Jul 30, 2012 at 15:42 | comment | added | walkmanyi | You always have the option not to submit to the post-proceedings, or the associated special-issue in this case. If you are worried about crappiness of the venue which is effectively imposed on you, simply do not submit your work to the journal and inform the editors about the decision. After all, nobody can publish your paper without your consent, such as a formal copyright transfer in the case of "traditional" journals. Just save your good stuff for a better venue. | |
| Jul 30, 2012 at 15:36 | answer | added | David E Speyer | timeline score: 8 | |
| S Jul 30, 2012 at 13:55 | history | edited | StrongBad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved question.
|
| S Jul 30, 2012 at 13:55 | history | suggested | ShadowWarrior | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved question.
|
| Jul 30, 2012 at 13:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 30, 2012 at 13:55 | |||||
| Jul 30, 2012 at 11:54 | comment | added | Anonymous Mathematician | The "special issue of a journal" designation sounds worrisome to me. Even if it is just the usual conference proceedings repackaged, I think you are right that it will cause problems for later publication. (Even if the second journal agrees not to count the first as a "real" journal publication, it may still appear to onlookers like you are publishing the same paper in two journals.) | |
| Jul 30, 2012 at 11:33 | answer | added | Aaron | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jul 30, 2012 at 11:18 | history | asked | StrongBad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |