Timeline for Can someone really be assigned to review in the APS’s editorial system for over a month without reacting at all and if yes, why?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2014 at 7:07 | answer | added | nathanielng | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 17, 2014 at 6:07 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/489652671574704128 | ||
| Jul 16, 2014 at 1:38 | comment | added | user1482 | Reviewers are not paid. You don't ask people to do unpaid volunteer work and then impose harsh restrictions on them. | |
| Jul 15, 2014 at 13:53 | comment | added | ff524 | I don't think giving reviewers a few days to accept an invitation to review is standard for "all other publishers" - I've reviewed for journals which gave a few weeks to accept an invitation. Maybe this depends on the field? | |
| Jul 15, 2014 at 13:53 | comment | added | Dmitry Savostyanov | Imagine a prospective reviewer left for a vacation / conference for a week, and unable to respond. | |
| Jul 15, 2014 at 13:53 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 15, 2014 at 14:30 | |||||
| Jul 15, 2014 at 13:46 | history | asked | user19590 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |