Timeline for Are there any available studies on the effectiveness of "learning by teaching"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://skeptics.stackexchange.com/ with https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 18, 2014 at 2:04 | history | edited | Renan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jun 17, 2014 at 16:42 | comment | added | ff524 | Ok, I edited this question to clarify the difference between it and the one on Skeptics, and reopened. | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 16:41 | history | reopened | ff524 | ||
| Jun 17, 2014 at 16:40 | history | edited | ff524 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 385 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Jun 17, 2014 at 8:18 | comment | added | Nobody | What are you asking? "Learning by teaching" or "Learning by studying"? | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 6:25 | comment | added | Renan | I deleted the identical question in Cognitive Sciences. There isn't an identical question is Skeptics though. The purpose of that question was to verify if a specific claim is true. On the other hand, in Academia the purpose is to find studies proving or disproving that "learning by studying" is more efficient than other learning methods. | |
| S Jun 15, 2014 at 22:06 | history | closed | ff524 | Not suitable for this site | |
| S Jun 15, 2014 at 22:06 | comment | added | ff524 | This question appears to be off-topic because it is against SE policy to cross-post an identical question on multiple SE sites. If you want this question to be in Academia.SE, you should delete it from the other sites (or ask a moderator from those sites to migrate your post to Ac.SE, and flag for merging here). | |
| Jun 15, 2014 at 22:04 | history | notice removed | ff524 | ||
| Jun 15, 2014 at 21:27 | answer | added | MetricDynamo | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jun 15, 2014 at 13:28 | comment | added | Brian P | This question is too ambiguous to find any relevant research. The retention rate for any instructional method, even "learning by teaching," will depend on many, many factors -- e.g., what is being taught or learned; prior experience or knowledge of the learner; prior teaching experience; age of the teacher/learner; etc. I would suggest rephrasing your question and being more specific about the teacher/learners and what content, skills or knowledge that is being taught. | |
| Jun 14, 2014 at 6:17 | comment | added | Martin | See also: skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/20888/… and cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/7594/… | |
| Jun 14, 2014 at 5:49 | history | notice added | Renan | Authoritative reference needed | |
| Jun 9, 2014 at 18:11 | comment | added | Renan | @AndrejaKo That study only mentions another study which is unavailable. It's impossible to confirm if the conclusion is reliable without any information about the size of the sample field and the criteria applied. | |
| Jun 9, 2014 at 4:37 | comment | added | AndrejaKo | @Renan What's wrong with the study mentioned in the Skeptics question? It does say number 90% in it, as far as I can see. | |
| Jun 8, 2014 at 1:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/475448016451932161 | ||
| Jun 8, 2014 at 0:07 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 8, 2014 at 1:30 | |||||
| Jun 7, 2014 at 23:48 | history | asked | Renan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |