Timeline for How to identify predatory publishers/journals
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
23 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 24, 2023 at 15:41 | comment | added | Franck Dernoncourt | @Wrzlprmft you're a mod now, you can merge these two questions. | |
May 25, 2021 at 17:26 | answer | added | Bjarte Lund | timeline score: 2 | |
S May 24, 2021 at 13:00 | history | suggested | Amazon Dies In Darkness | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
This is a current site that is frequently updated, so converted Wayback Machine link to actual site
|
May 24, 2021 at 11:08 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 24, 2021 at 13:00 | |||||
Feb 5, 2021 at 22:15 | review | Close votes | |||
Feb 17, 2021 at 3:04 | |||||
Nov 27, 2020 at 14:25 | comment | added | optimal control | I am not sure if this is the right call but you can simply look at who publishes in the journal in question. If there are some well-established researchers who publish, there are little chances that the journal is a predatory one. | |
Nov 27, 2020 at 14:15 | answer | added | Clément | timeline score: 3 | |
Sep 25, 2018 at 18:00 | answer | added | Nemo | timeline score: -2 | |
Aug 2, 2018 at 6:52 | comment | added | Don_S | Check out the blog Flaky Academic Journals. Interesting read. | |
Sep 17, 2017 at 17:41 | review | Close votes | |||
Sep 18, 2017 at 7:12 | |||||
Sep 17, 2017 at 17:26 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | Possible duplicate of With Beall's List gone, how can I tell if a journal is spam? (Yes, it’s newer, but it also has better answers, not that the answer to this is bad.) | |
S Jun 13, 2017 at 13:41 | history | suggested | user2768 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Updated URL of broken link
|
Jun 13, 2017 at 13:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jun 13, 2017 at 13:41 | |||||
Apr 19, 2017 at 12:11 | comment | added | henning no longer feeds AI | The original list of predatory publishers went offline. Here is an archived copy. | |
Feb 5, 2015 at 11:36 | comment | added | E.P. | Many of the criteria in this answer also apply for more general fields. | |
S Aug 7, 2014 at 8:26 | history | suggested | Wrzlprmft♦ |
Added disreputable-publishers tag (see http://meta.academia.stackexchange.com/q/1148/7734)
|
|
Aug 7, 2014 at 8:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Aug 7, 2014 at 8:26 | |||||
Aug 6, 2012 at 7:40 | comment | added | David Ketcheson | Beall's answer is up now, here: scholarlyoa.com/2012/08/04/… | |
Jul 31, 2012 at 10:13 | vote | accept | StrongBad | ||
Jun 26, 2012 at 4:02 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | In mathematics at least, simply refusing to ever pay anything to get your work published should do the trick. I gather that trying this strategy in certain other fields (e.g. biology?) may weed out some legitimate -- and even prestigious -- journals. | |
Jun 25, 2012 at 22:36 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/217385889377161217 | ||
Jun 25, 2012 at 14:11 | answer | added | David Ketcheson | timeline score: 48 | |
Jun 25, 2012 at 13:38 | history | asked | StrongBad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |