Timeline for Do publishers actually care about arXiv?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9 at 10:04 | comment | added | Pronte | Thanks Anyon. Embargo was not of particular interest, I'm wondering in general if publishers care about preprints and it seems they do! A big difference is probably the fact that these were the final manuscript, and not the text recompiled in another template as is the case for arxiv (maybe this is why they don't even accept PDF anymore!) If you post it as an answer I'll approve it (sure makes me glad I ignored all those ResearchGate emails saying "we found your full text online!") | |
| Aug 7 at 16:43 | comment | added | Anyon | Not arXiv, but ResearchGate was sued for facilitating unlicensed sharing of papers. Posting this as a comment, because it's unclear to me if any of the alleged infringements were under an embargo period. | |
| Aug 6 at 16:14 | history | edited | Pronte | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
| Aug 6 at 16:11 | comment | added | Pronte | The links you mention are about preprints, and rules for what is a preprint, I am asking a different thing: "what happens when someone accidentally breaks these rules? do publisher come after you?" I feel it is clear from what I wrote, so I'm not sure how to edit, but I tried to remove any ambiguity. | |
| Aug 5 at 23:37 | comment | added | Allure | Springer allows you to self-archive on your own website immediately but has an embargo of 12 months for arXiv and similar public repositories. That's not correct. See springer.com/gp/editorial-policies/preprint-sharing, you are free to share preprints on the arXiv. See also academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44524/… | |
| Aug 5 at 19:25 | history | asked | Pronte | CC BY-SA 4.0 |