Timeline for In a grant proposal, should I write that I have a paper very likely to be accepted by a very prestigious journal? and how?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19 at 7:53 | comment | added | Maarten Buis | @EarlGrey that is discipline specific. In my field it is fairly common (and very annoying and inefficient) for a paper to be rejected in the second or even third round. | |
| Jan 19 at 7:50 | comment | added | EarlGrey | "so they also have to reject very good submissions" true, but usually this comes in as a desk reject and/or as a reject at first review. | |
| Jan 18 at 9:36 | comment | added | zensho yusho | I agree with you, albeit the solution proposed by @Dawn seems a good compromise between claiming the paper too early and not acknowledging it at all. I think I will go for that one, but I'll be careful to not overstate it. Thanks. | |
| Jan 17 at 16:24 | history | answered | Maarten Buis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |