Timeline for Citing articles while writing a reply to the referee/editor's reports: do I need to do that?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20 at 0:55 | vote | accept | High GPA | ||
| Dec 15, 2023 at 8:36 | comment | added | The Doctor | I agree with @frederik, if you want short and unambiguous referencing just use the DOI. | |
| Dec 13, 2023 at 16:03 | comment | added | frederik | Sometimes what you think might be an unambiguous reference might not be so unambiguous after all - there is probably more than one Yu et al, Famous Journal, 2022. Also you want to make the reviewers' life as easy as possible. Solution: also state the DOI, or create a clickable DOI link. Still informal but makes it easy for the reviewer to have a quick peek at the cited paper if they want to. | |
| Dec 13, 2023 at 12:13 | comment | added | High GPA | This is exactly what I prefer! Though my advisor told me to have a formal list of references, just like a formal paper: I felt a bit uncomfortable doing that. | |
| Dec 13, 2023 at 1:44 | history | answered | Allure | CC BY-SA 4.0 |