Timeline for Authorship: PI has put themself first and others alphabetical. Is this reasonable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 2023 at 1:26 | comment | added | Mihail | Being in the math community and reading that somewhere else an author might be first in the line only because they provided funding sounds so.. so.. unfair. People might say that it is a convention so everybody take that into the account already, but there is still symbolic value behind and heartbreaking belittling of a scientist who might have done an enormous intellectual work. The best would be just to include the people with minimal intellectual contribution i.e. sources of grants and fruitfull conversations in the acknowledgement section | |
| Nov 15, 2023 at 15:51 | comment | added | GEdgar | +1 "I advise not starting what are ultimately inconsequential battles with peers" | |
| Nov 15, 2023 at 15:12 | history | edited | Buffy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Nov 15, 2023 at 15:04 | history | answered | Buffy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |