Timeline for Should first authorship be given to the one who proposes an algorithm or the one who implements the algorithm?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2023 at 5:18 | vote | accept | Neuchâtel | ||
| Oct 2, 2023 at 12:29 | answer | added | Buffy | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 2, 2023 at 11:09 | comment | added | aqua | What about writing the paper? I can imagine that if you have the idea (and your pseudocode is indeed working) and you also write the paper, then you both should be co-first authors. | |
| Oct 2, 2023 at 9:38 | comment | added | lighthouse keeper | @Stef's comment should be expended into an answer, and then it's the correct one. | |
| Oct 2, 2023 at 8:57 | history | edited | Neuchâtel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Oct 2, 2023 at 8:37 | answer | added | EarlGrey | timeline score: -3 | |
| Oct 2, 2023 at 7:59 | history | edited | Neuchâtel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Oct 2, 2023 at 7:57 | comment | added | Stef | This probably entirely depends on how much work goes into going from "pseudocode" to "implemented". The word "algorithm" is rather vague, and it's very possible that most of the work will be in the actual implementation. Not to mention, once you have implemented the algorithm you'll need to test it, and choosing what data to test it on is probably important work, too. | |
| Oct 2, 2023 at 6:21 | answer | added | sErISaNo | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 2, 2023 at 2:41 | comment | added | Anonymous Physicist | It's really better if all the authors are involved in the writing of the paper. | |
| Oct 2, 2023 at 1:44 | history | edited | Neuchâtel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| Oct 2, 2023 at 1:33 | history | asked | Neuchâtel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |