Timeline for Etiquette concerning Lab Findings / Results
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2023 at 11:12 | comment | added | Sascha | @penelope: Even if the principal researcher was not involved in the (co)author sense, he can still stop it, if funds they were responsible for were used - this has nothing to do with the scientific responsibility about which you are talking. I.e. it if the principals responsibility to determine how the results to publish are split in a way that it suits the people in the project and the project. If e.g. student published something it may affect another publication being prepared (since you declare that you did not publish previously). Not saying that this is good, but that is as it is. | |
| Sep 22, 2023 at 10:56 | comment | added | penelope | Actually, it's the role/right of all the participants in a research study to allow publication of results. Even a junior researcher can stop a publication going ahead if they have contributed to the research and don't agree with publishing it for any reason. Mind you, blocking a publication like that out of spite probably won't put you in anybody's good graces, but if is every researcher's role/right to allow whether the results of their research will get published. | |
| Sep 21, 2023 at 10:57 | history | answered | Sascha | CC BY-SA 4.0 |