Timeline for Standard style when citing different authors from the same group
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2014 at 7:50 | history | edited | Miguel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 260 characters in body
|
| Apr 30, 2014 at 7:45 | vote | accept | Miguel | ||
| Apr 30, 2014 at 1:17 | comment | added | JeffE | If you want to emphasize the unity of the work, emphasize the unity of the work, not the common coauthor. | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 18:15 | comment | added | Miguel | Nothing wrong, I could just do that, but I want to emphasize the unity of the work, rather the individuality of the different papers. The only common author in this otherwise very "compact" work is the group leader. | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 17:20 | answer | added | Suresh | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 16:49 | answer | added | Bill Barth | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 16:22 | comment | added | JeffE | What's wrong with "A et al., B et al., and C et al."? | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 14:04 | comment | added | aeismail | This is exactly the reason for the phrase "X and {colleagues, co-authors, co-workers}." | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 13:37 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 29, 2014 at 14:29 | |||||
| Apr 29, 2014 at 13:36 | answer | added | StrongBad | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 29, 2014 at 13:21 | history | asked | Miguel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |