Timeline for Rejecting a Paper from a Prestigious Lab as a Reviewer
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2023 at 16:16 | comment | added | jakebeal | @Ray The alternative is to coach them on how to review well, as most of the answers here are suggesting. | |
| Jul 27, 2023 at 14:44 | comment | added | Ray | @jakebeal If the alternative is for them to "peer-review" by focusing on the name of the lab rather than the math and experiments, that's for the best. Either way, they aren't writing a real review. | |
| Jul 26, 2023 at 12:13 | comment | added | jakebeal | They are not the only one who will read your post. I have known early career researchers who are highly competent but struggle with self-confidence and imposter syndrome who would, in fact, likely choose to simply not peer review based on your advise. | |
| Jul 26, 2023 at 11:46 | comment | added | Buffy | @jakebeal, actually, I think the OP got the intended message, which is to do the job properly. | |
| Jul 26, 2023 at 10:29 | comment | added | jakebeal | I don't think it's very responsible to advise an early career researcher to quit reviewing. They may take you seriously! | |
| Jul 25, 2023 at 20:14 | comment | added | Mr.Robot | Thank you! I will ask PC to take precautions and give honest reviews. | |
| Jul 25, 2023 at 19:43 | history | answered | Buffy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |