Timeline for How to handle reviewing a paper which I suspect has been generated by AI?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2023 at 9:37 | comment | added | m123 | @Kimball: And then, if AI did plagiarism, put it in a blacklist, or in a jail... | |
| Jul 22, 2023 at 1:57 | comment | added | paul garrett | @Kimball, exactly! Semi-seriously!?! Seriously?!? Maybe. I have no idea. (I hardly manage to cooperate with anyone at all, beyond my five-year-old iMac, with whom I'm on pretty good terms.) | |
| Jul 21, 2023 at 23:22 | comment | added | Kimball | After all, if corporations are legally entitled to being treated as legit political entities, why can't AI's be comparably respected? Own copyright? - Well, in that case the AI should be listed as the author, so this would be plagiarism, right? | |
| Jul 21, 2023 at 20:43 | history | answered | paul garrett | CC BY-SA 4.0 |