Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 5, 2023 at 13:32 answer added Jared Greathouse timeline score: 0
Apr 16, 2023 at 7:00 vote accept aimedaca
Apr 15, 2023 at 18:26 comment added Christian Hennig @quantacad "doing new simulations to fill in gaps" etc. - If this is what reviewers wrote about earlier publications, this one (and maybe to some extent the others) doesn't necessarily mean you made a mistake. In my field (statistics), regarding methodological papers with simulations, this request comes almost surely, pretty much regardless of the quality of the paper, as you can never simulate everything, and many reviewers feel they need to request something. Keep in mind in many fields requesting revisions is a standard. They (almost) always find something.
Apr 15, 2023 at 9:39 comment added Daron Even if you are a single author, you are always free to ask people in your research group to proofread your paper for mistakes, and pay them back by doing the same. This can be mentioned in the Acknowledgements section.
Apr 15, 2023 at 3:43 comment added Azor Ahai -him- Please tag a field. I will likely never publish a single-author paper, until I'm some 70-year-old emeritus professor publishing some overview of the field (if the water wars don't take me).
Apr 15, 2023 at 3:12 history became hot network question
Apr 14, 2023 at 14:23 comment added aimedaca Better interpretation of the results; doing new simulations to fill in gaps; storyline of the main result.
Apr 14, 2023 at 12:52 comment added lighthouse keeper What is the nature of the mistakes / significant corrections that were done in the past?
Apr 14, 2023 at 12:16 answer added Buffy timeline score: 7
Apr 14, 2023 at 11:56 answer added Christian Hennig timeline score: 14
Apr 14, 2023 at 11:54 answer added CrimsonDark timeline score: 2
Apr 14, 2023 at 11:01 history asked aimedaca CC BY-SA 4.0