Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 12, 2023 at 1:06 comment added d-b You spent twice as much time on this review than you would have done if you had written two separate reviews, didn't you? So it was a better "product", you learned as much as you would if you had written two reviews etc.
Mar 11, 2023 at 17:03 comment added Vilx- By any chance, the academic policy wouldn't have been updated in the last 4 months, would it?
Mar 10, 2023 at 23:20 comment added Scott Seidman @Prof.SantaClaus plagiarism has nothing to do with copyright.
Mar 10, 2023 at 15:29 comment added Peter - Reinstate Monica Plagiarism is a serious matter. Now that you are aware of it: You should write a cease-and-desist letter to the copycat and demand a compensation; perhaps he could invite you and your partner to a posh restaurant downtown? Be stern and let him not get away with it! ;-) [I know your concern is with the double use university rules but I could not resist.]
Mar 10, 2023 at 8:32 comment added Spook I think there's a question worth answering: was it really an instance of "work smarter not harder", or rather an instance of "I'm trying to find a way to avoid doing work which I have to do"? The difference may be slim, but still...
Mar 9, 2023 at 13:00 answer added Buffy timeline score: 10
Mar 9, 2023 at 12:15 answer added MJeffryes timeline score: 21
Mar 9, 2023 at 10:40 comment added Ander Biguri Juts a clarification: you intentionally self-plagiarized, without knowing it was against the rules. Its still your work, so while you probably should have checked, its not the same as just plagiarism, as you are not claiming someone else work to be yours. But don't build your defense (if you need to) with the word unintentionally, because it was intentional, the unintentional thing was to break the rules, not self-plagiarize. I agree with Michael's answer anyway.
Mar 9, 2023 at 9:48 history became hot network question
Mar 9, 2023 at 4:52 comment added Prof. Santa Claus Is it self-plagiarism? The work is yours and you didn't sign off on the copyright. The main problem is that it goes against university policy, which specifies that you must not use previously submitted work. Otherwise, you are getting a 'free' ride.
Mar 9, 2023 at 3:43 answer added fedja timeline score: 21
Mar 9, 2023 at 1:25 answer added Michael_1812 timeline score: 47
S Mar 8, 2023 at 23:54 review First questions
Mar 9, 2023 at 1:07
S Mar 8, 2023 at 23:54 history asked ellis86 CC BY-SA 4.0