Timeline for Coauthor removed from the manuscript
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2022 at 14:00 | comment | added | Mnopqrs | Update: nobody writes me back from the editorial board… My actual boss told me that I cannot do anything if they used “different” measurements not mine… even if they just reproduced my data | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 22:04 | answer | added | yarchik | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 16:28 | answer | added | ojfew owmx | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 15:13 | comment | added | Mnopqrs | It is not the main message but it was one of the starting points many years ago. I was thinking it would be interesting to measure, I developed a method and it worked. They worked a lot in the paper so the figure they used is a part of a figure. Therefore I did not exept something else but be in the middle in an unimportant position. But this would be important for me. They asked for my protocols and they reproduced my data. In the first version of the manuscript my data points were used. They just replaced them. | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 14:58 | comment | added | yarchik | Just a clarification question without suggesting anything yet. What is the role of your data for the whole paper? I can imagine several levels: 1. The data is the very message of the paper; 2. The data is the starting point and therefore essential for subsequent analysis, but analysis is straightforward; 3. The analysis is non-trivial and data is merely used for the illustration of it; 4. Paper has multiple messages and the data is used to support one of them. | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 9:21 | comment | added | Mnopqrs | Exactly this is what happened. They just replaced my experiments with theirs (they claimed they have found enough data on their own so they do not “need” my data) The result is the same. So in this version “I did not contribute enough” to be an author and there was “no reason to put me in”…I gave them my protocol a few years ago which they used but “sharing expertise is not a reason for a coauthorship, whit this reason they shoud include the whole institute to the author list” They just left me out behind my back without contacting me… | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 9:09 | comment | added | a3nm | Hi, I am sorry to hear about that. I am not an expert, but just to say that if you are willing to contest this, I think the most precious evidence is that first rejected submission to a journal, with your name on the submitted paper -- which the first journal can confirm. If your coauthors published similar material afterwards without you mentioned as an author, and without your approval, this should be very clearly suspicious to anyone investigating this from the outside. | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1588410728645627904 | ||
| Nov 4, 2022 at 0:25 | answer | added | academiaTA | timeline score: 10 | |
| Nov 4, 2022 at 0:00 | comment | added | Kimball | Just to make it clear to you: reproducing your data does not give them the right to remove you as a coauthor. Eg, if I prove a theorem, and my colleague reads my proof, and then recreates the proof, they can't go around claiming they proved that theorem and not attribute it to me. That is plagiarism. | |
| Nov 3, 2022 at 18:41 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Nov 3, 2022 at 16:38 | history | undeleted | cag51♦ | ||
| Nov 3, 2022 at 13:34 | history | deleted | Wrzlprmft♦ | via Vote | |
| Nov 3, 2022 at 13:07 | answer | added | Buffy | timeline score: 27 | |
| S Nov 3, 2022 at 10:38 | review | First questions | |||
| Nov 3, 2022 at 13:27 | |||||
| S Nov 3, 2022 at 10:38 | history | asked | Mnopqrs | CC BY-SA 4.0 |