Timeline for Does MDPI systematically choose new reviewers after each round in order to speed up the process?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2023 at 20:42 | comment | added | user71659 | @JochenGlueck One is entitled to have their paper evaluated fairly, and that includes consistently following policies of the journal. If the journal's policy is to require a second round of reviews, as the other answer indicates, then they are entitled to a second round of reviews. | |
| Feb 16, 2023 at 20:55 | comment | added | Jochen Glueck | "Neither authors nor reviewers are entitled to a second round of reviews." I'm not sure I understand the point of this sentence. Professional behaviour is not about "entitlement". | |
| Jul 23, 2022 at 15:35 | comment | added | Buzz | I just did a second round of reviews for one of the better MDPI journals (Symmetry) last night. They appear to have sent the paper back to all three of the original reviewers. | |
| Jul 23, 2022 at 3:47 | history | answered | Anonymous Physicist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |