Timeline for Mathematical manuscript flaws between major revision and reject
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2022 at 14:58 | answer | added | Jochen Glueck | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 25, 2022 at 23:11 | comment | added | Prof. Santa Claus | I think they rely on the authors and reviewers. Let's say a reviewer says a proof is flawed. Then it's up to the authors to admit that the reviewer is correct and thus a new proof is required (if possible). Otherwise, the authors provide a response to counter the reviewer's assertion. If a proof is critical and cannot be corrected, then the authors will withdraw the manuscript. Otherwise, it's up to reviewers to check the responses or revised proof provided by the authors. | |
| Jul 25, 2022 at 17:21 | answer | added | Ben Webster | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 16, 2022 at 17:26 | vote | accept | Med Med | ||
| Jul 16, 2022 at 15:13 | answer | added | Buffy | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jul 16, 2022 at 14:23 | comment | added | Ed V | Time to correct issues is not the only factor in rejections. | |
| S Jul 16, 2022 at 14:10 | review | First questions | |||
| Jul 16, 2022 at 16:21 | |||||
| S Jul 16, 2022 at 14:10 | history | asked | Med Med | CC BY-SA 4.0 |