Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 26, 2022 at 10:45 comment added CrimsonDark Why the downvotes. The OP might be naive (in the sense of not knowing what might be typical of many fields) but that doesn't make the question unreasonable?
Jul 3, 2022 at 0:01 comment added Azor Ahai -him- @user366312 That's an important distinction. Being on a non-first-author paper varies from next to meaningless to somewhat impotant.
Jul 2, 2022 at 23:30 comment added user366312 @AzorAhai-him-, When you say "published," do you mean the first author? --- coauthor; with other group members and the P.I.
Jul 2, 2022 at 21:10 comment added Azor Ahai -him- When you say "published," do you mean first author?
Jul 2, 2022 at 18:42 answer added Jochen Glueck timeline score: 10
Jul 2, 2022 at 16:10 comment added Jon Custer The PhD students are publishing and graduating. All is good. Don’t get ‘paper envy’, particularly relative to other fields.
Jul 2, 2022 at 14:02 comment added Anonymous Physicist All I can say about machine learning is that it is not a comparable field.
Jul 2, 2022 at 12:14 comment added user366312 @AnonymousPhysicist, For a Ph.D. student in molecular modeling to have 15 publications is peculiar. --- the person I referred to is not working in the same field as I am. He is working in machine learning and bioinformatics.
Jul 2, 2022 at 12:09 comment added Anonymous Physicist I do not see a problem. This sounds pretty normal. Keep in mind that in your field, the number of first author papers can be more important for PhD students than the total number of publications. For a PhD student in molecular modeling to have 15 publications is peculiar. Some people publish many papers before starting their PhD.
Jul 2, 2022 at 11:46 comment added user366312 @mmm, Molecular modeling, and simulation.
Jul 2, 2022 at 11:41 comment added mmm what's your field? In any theoretical area, even 5 papers during a PhD would be extremely impressive
Jul 2, 2022 at 11:37 history asked user366312 CC BY-SA 4.0